Biliary· Chapter 28

ERCP and EUS Procedures

ERCP cannulation strategy, post-ERCP pancreatitis prevention with rectal indomethacin and the prophylactic PD stent, EUS FNA versus FNB tissue acquisition, direct endoscopic necrosectomy via LAMS, EUS-guided biliary drainage when conventional ERCP fails, and ampullectomy decision-making.

66 MCQs7 podcast episodes
Published by Board PearlsUpdated How we write these
  • Audio chapter
    Single-voice audio, listen on the commute.
  • ABIM-format MCQs
    5-option vignettes with full wrong-answer teaching.
  • Study guide
    Tables, decision trees, primary sources.
  • AI tutor
    Chapter-grounded, answers the question you're stuck on.

What this chapter covers

  • Section 29.1: ERCP indications, cannulation, and PEP prophylaxis

    ERCP is a therapeutic procedure that carries pancreatitis risk, and every part of the workflow exists to keep that risk in check.

  • Section 29.2: Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in EPISOD era

    The EPISOD trial reshaped how sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is diagnosed and treated.

  • Section 29.3: Biliary stricture tissue acquisition

    The question of how to obtain tissue from a biliary stricture turns on the upstream clinical context: a transplant candidate, a patient awaiting neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a post-cholecystectomy patient with focal intrahepatic ductal dilation, or an indeterminate stricture after multiple negative ERCP brushings.

  • Section 29.4: Ampullectomy and endoscopic papillectomy

    Ampullary adenomas are detected either as sporadic lesions found incidentally during EGD or ERCP, or as part of duodenal polyposis surveillance in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), where the ampulla is the most common site of duodenal adenoma.

  • Section 29.5: Malignant biliary obstruction stenting

    Malignant biliary obstruction stenting strategy depends on the location of the obstruction, the resectability of the underlying tumor, and the anticipated life expectancy.

  • Section 29.6: EUS-guided biliary drainage rescue

    EUS-guided biliary drainage is the modern rescue path when ERCP cannulation fails in a patient with a dilated bile duct.

  • Section 29.7: ERCP in altered anatomy

    Surgical alteration of upper GI anatomy creates barriers between the side-viewing duodenoscope and the major papilla that drive procedural choice.

  • Section 29.8: EUS and ERCP in pancreatitis

    The indication for ERCP and EUS in pancreatitis is structural disease or stone burden, and the threshold for action reflects the modest expected benefit of intervention against the substantial PEP risk that any ERCP carries.

  • Section 29.9: Pancreatic fluid collections and EUS therapeutic drainage

    Symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections at 4 weeks or later (when the collection has formed a mature wall) are managed endoscopically through EUS-guided transmural drainage.

  • Section 29.10: Direct endoscopic necrosectomy

    Direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) is the through-LAMS debridement procedure performed when transmural drainage alone fails to clear solid debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis.

  • Section 29.11: EUS tissue acquisition

    EUS tissue acquisition decisions turn on three connected ideas: lesion identity follows sonographic layer, needle choice follows the diagnostic question, and the EUS layer informs the differential while the needle type informs the diagnostic yield.

  • Section 29.12: EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis

    EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) is performed for unresectable pancreatic cancer pain refractory to opioids, where opioid escalation produces unacceptable side effects (constipation, sedation, cognitive impairment) before achieving adequate pain control.

  • Section 29.13: ERCP in pregnancy

    ERCP in pregnancy is performed when biliary obstruction with cholangitis, severe gallstone pancreatitis with persistent obstruction, large stone with refractory symptoms, or post-cholecystectomy bile leak demands intervention that cannot be deferred to postpartum.

  • Section 29.14: ERCP complications and reprocessing

    ERCP complications are categorized by mechanism and frequency, with PEP and post-sphincterotomy bleeding the dominant concerns and duodenoscope reprocessing the quality and safety concern that has reshaped device design.

Podcast episodes

  1. 01

    Safe Cannulation and PEP Prophylaxis

    Episode one of the ERCP and EUS Procedures chapter starts from the single fact that reorganizes everything: ERCP is a therapy, not a test, so you earn the right to do it only when a non-invasive study cannot answer the question. From there the whole episode is risk management. Wire-guided cannulation replaces the hydraulic contrast push that floods the pancreatic duct, difficult-cannulation maneuvers each solve one anatomic problem, and the prophylaxis stack is held by mechanism because the mechanisms tell you who needs which. The organizing thread: find the duct by guidance, then stack indomethacin, a pancreatic duct stent, and lactated Ringer on the patient whose risk factors say the pancreas will react.

    Read the transcript →
  2. 02

    Patient Selection and Complications

    Episode two is about the decision that comes before cannulation and the restraint it takes to decline the procedure when objective evidence for benefit is absent. A landmark sham-controlled trial retired type three sphincter of Oddi dysfunction as a sphincterotomy indication, so pain with normal labs and a normal duct becomes a functional pain disorder, not an ERCP. Pregnancy raises the threshold highest because a second patient absorbs all the risk and none of the benefit. The back half turns on two failure mechanisms, the cut that bleeds and the elevator that harbors biofilm, and each names the patient to protect and the device choice that protects them.

    Read the transcript →
  3. 03

    The Obstructed and Indeterminate Biliary Tree

    Episode three centers on the stricture you cannot name: painless jaundice, a tight narrowing, and imaging that says cancer without proving it. Tissue acquisition is the whole game, and every step up the diagnostic cascade works by getting closer to the tumor, from a shallow brush that misses submucosal cholangiocarcinoma to intraductal biopsy and FISH to cholangioscopy to an EUS needle in the mass itself. The transplant candidate inverts that hierarchy, because a needle in the hilar primary can seed the peritoneum and disqualify the cure. Then durable drainage follows anatomy: covered metal distally to block ingrowth, uncovered metal at the hilum to preserve side branches, and always enough viable liver drained to clear the bilirubin.

    Read the transcript →
  4. 04

    When Standard ERCP Fails

    Episode four picks up the moment standard ERCP fails, and it runs on a single habit: name the anatomic barrier and let it choose the technique. When you cannot cannulate the papilla, a dilated duct becomes an EUS target, and the finishing options rank by how much natural drainage they keep, rendezvous over choledochoduodenostomy over hepaticogastrostomy. When surgery has hidden the papilla, the question is how to restore the duodenoscope's en face view through the particular barrier, so EDGE tunnels into the bypassed stomach, balloon enteroscopy reaches a hepaticojejunostomy, and a reversed cautious approach handles Billroth two. Device design and technique are consequences of the anatomy, not lists to memorize.

    Read the transcript →
  5. 05

    Recurrent Pancreatitis and Duct Decompression

    Episode five holds EUS and ERCP to one standard in the pancreatitis spectrum: they earn their place only when there is structural disease or stone burden to act on, because every procedure carries a real pancreatitis risk weighed against a modest expected benefit. In the recurrent-attack workup, EUS for microlithiasis is the highest-yield study after MRCP, while sphincterotomy for divisum and idiopathic disease is the reflex sham-controlled data have humbled. In the chronic gland you decompress discrete obstructive lesions and read the true predictors of success, disease duration, cessation, and stone burden rather than head calcification. Standing over all of it, a randomized trial favors early surgical drainage for the painful dilated duct.

    Read the transcript →
  6. 06

    Fluid Collections and Necrosectomy

    Episode six takes the pancreatitis spectrum to its end: the collections the gland leaves behind. Timing runs on wall-maturation logic, waiting about four weeks for a rind strong enough to hold a transmural anastomosis, and the contents decide everything downstream, since a pseudocyst and walled-off necrosis need different stents and different follow-through. Before any puncture you image for a pseudoaneurysm and embolize it first, because needling a shared wall can cause uncontrolled hemorrhage. Drainage is a step-up, transmural first and necrosectomy only when the cavity will not empty, and two failure modes both turn on sequence. Necrosectomy itself carries one non-negotiable safety rule: carbon dioxide insufflation, because air can embolize.

    Read the transcript →
  7. 07

    EUS Beyond the Ducts

    The final episode turns EUS from a guide for therapy into a diagnostician and a palliator, and it runs on one habit: reason from substrate to answer. The five alternating wall layers plus echotexture place a subepithelial lesion and narrow the differential before a needle moves, so a hypoechoic layer-four mass is a GIST until tissue proves otherwise. The needle choice then turns on a single distinction, cells versus architecture, because lymphoma, GIST, and autoimmune pancreatitis all live in structure a core preserves and cytology destroys. Finally the same probe that finds the tumor treats its pain: alcohol neurolysis for cancer, a reversible steroid block for benign disease, with complications that read straight off the interrupted sympathetic outflow.

    Read the transcript →

Key topics

  • ERCP as therapy, not a diagnostic test
  • Post-ERCP pancreatitis risk and mechanism
  • Wire-guided versus contrast-first cannulation
  • Difficult-cannulation escalation and EUS rendezvous
  • Rectal indomethacin prophylaxis
  • Prophylactic pancreatic duct stent
  • Aggressive lactated Ringer hydration
  • High-risk patient profile and protective chronic pancreatitis
  • Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction types and the landmark trial
  • Post-cholecystectomy duct dilation as physiologic compensation
  • ERCP in pregnancy and radiation minimization
  • Sedation and positioning in pregnancy
  • Post-sphincterotomy bleeding risk factors
  • Balloon dilation versus sphincterotomy in coagulopathy
  • Perforation and the Stapfer classification
  • Duodenoscope biofilm and single-use scopes
  • Brush cytology and why it misses cholangiocarcinoma
  • Intraductal biopsy, FISH, and cholangioscopy
  • EUS fine needle biopsy of a pancreatic head mass
  • Transplant candidate and needle-tract seeding
  • Endoscopic ampullectomy versus Whipple
  • Distal covered metal stents
  • Hilar uncovered metal stents and side branches
  • Draining fifty percent of viable liver
  • EUS-guided biliary drainage and the dilated-duct target
  • EUS-guided rendezvous
  • Choledochoduodenostomy with a LAMS
  • Hepaticogastrostomy and anti-migration stents
  • Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and the EDGE procedure
  • Balloon enteroscopy for hepaticojejunostomy

Sources

Guidelines, consensus statements, and validated instruments this chapter draws on. Named here because the chapter applies them directly.

Professional society guidelines

  • American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)

Classification and diagnostic criteria

  • Rome IV criteria (functional GI disorders)
  • Revised Atlanta classification (acute pancreatitis)
  • Tokyo Guidelines (acute cholangitis and cholecystitis)
  • Kyoto classification / consensus