Two questions from the history choose the first test for dysphagia. The first is where the bolus stops: oropharyngeal dysphagia is a problem of bolus initiation and transfer from mouth to upper esophagus, while esophageal dysphagia is a problem of bolus transit through the tubular esophagus to the stomach. The second is which foods cause trouble: mechanical narrowing produces a progressive solids-then-liquids pattern, while motility disorders affect solids and liquids equally from the start. Oropharyngeal dysphagia goes to videofluoroscopy with a speech therapist before EGD because EGD does not visualize the swallowing maneuver and a Zenker pouch can be perforated by blind intubation. Esophageal dysphagia goes to EGD with biopsies first, because EGD addresses both the structural differential and EoE simultaneously.
Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a failure of the initiation phase of swallowing, in which the tongue, soft palate, and pharyngeal constrictors must coordinate with relaxation of the upper esophageal sphincter to drive a bolus across the cricopharyngeus. Most cases are neuromuscular: stroke, Parkinson disease, ALS, myasthenia gravis, and head and neck radiation each disrupt one or more elements of that coordinated sequence. Zenker diverticulum is the structural exception in this category because it forms at the same anatomic transition. Patients describe coughing on swallow, nasal regurgitation when palatal closure fails, drooling when oral containment is impaired, and frank aspiration when the bolus reaches an unprotected airway. The diagnostic test of choice is the modified barium swallow, also called videofluoroscopic swallow study, performed with a speech-language pathologist who watches the bolus in real time across multiple consistencies and head positions. EGD has no role in primary oropharyngeal dysphagia evaluation because it does not visualize the swallowing event and provides no information about aspiration risk or compensatory maneuvers. A cricopharyngeal bar on barium reflects failure of the upper esophageal sphincter to relax and is treated with cricopharyngeal myotomy or, in selected patients, botulinum toxin to the cricopharyngeus.
Zenker diverticulum is the main reason barium swallow precedes EGD in oropharyngeal dysphagia. It is a false diverticulum (mucosa and submucosa only, no muscular layer) that herniates posteriorly through Killian triangle, the area of relative weakness between the oblique fibers of the inferior pharyngeal constrictor above and the transverse fibers of the cricopharyngeus below. The mechanism is functional outflow obstruction at the upper esophageal sphincter (incomplete cricopharyngeal relaxation, often called cricopharyngeal dysfunction) that drives intraluminal pressure into the wall during repeated swallowing over years. Most patients are in the seventh or eighth decade and roughly 90 percent present with dysphagia. The presentation that gives the diagnosis away is regurgitation of undigested food eaten hours or days earlier, halitosis from the trapped material, gurgling sounds during or after swallowing, chronic cough, and aspiration pneumonia from spillage of pouch contents into the airway. Diagnosis is made by barium swallow, which fills the pouch and shows a posterior outpouching at the cervical esophagus. EGD is avoided as the initial test because the scope tip can enter the pouch rather than the true lumen and perforate the diverticulum. Treatment is cricopharyngeal myotomy combined with diverticulotomy, performed open, by transoral stapled approach (which divides the wall between pouch and esophagus in a single firing), or by flexible endoscopic Z-POEM where the cricopharyngeus is divided through a submucosal tunnel.
Esophageal dysphagia begins with the symptom history, because the pattern usually tells you whether to expect a structural lesion or a motility disorder before any test is ordered. Mechanical narrowing produces dysphagia first to solids and only later to liquids as the lumen narrows further; the differential includes Schatzki ring, esophageal web, peptic stricture, eosinophilic esophagitis, and esophageal malignancy. Motility disorders produce dysphagia to solids and liquids together from the outset, because the propagated wave fails on every bolus regardless of consistency; the differential here is achalasia, distal esophageal spasm, jackhammer esophagus, and scleroderma esophagus.
EGD with esophageal biopsies is the first test in nearly every patient with esophageal dysphagia, because it covers the structural differential, identifies subtle eosinophilic esophagitis in mucosa that can look entirely normal at endoscopy, and rules out malignancy. Esophageal biopsies for EoE are obtained at two levels (proximal and distal, two to four samples each) even when the mucosa appears unremarkable, because EoE is a histologic diagnosis and the esophagus appears endoscopically normal in up to a third of cases (roughly 10 to 32 percent) (see Ch 5 for the EoE deep dive). Barium swallow is added when EGD is non-diagnostic or when motility is suspected, because the timed barium esophagram visualizes a tertiary contraction pattern, a bird-beak narrowing, or a corkscrew morphology that points to the manometric study that follows.
New dysphagia is itself an alarm symptom, and EGD with biopsies is the workup for esophageal dysphagia regardless of what other features the patient carries. The features people memorize as alarm features (age over 50, unintentional weight loss, iron deficiency anemia, overt or occult GI bleeding, progressive solid food dysphagia, persistent vomiting) do not trigger EGD because EGD is already happening. They raise the pretest probability of malignancy specifically, which changes urgency and changes what the endoscopist is looking for. Progressive solid food dysphagia in a 65-year-old smoker with weight loss is esophageal cancer until proven otherwise, and the workup goes from a routine EGD with biopsies to an EGD plus immediate staging if a mass is found.
What the boards test
Oropharyngeal dysphagia (coughing, nasal regurgitation, aspiration at swallow onset) goes to modified barium swallow with a speech pathologist, not EGD. Esophageal dysphagia goes to EGD with two-level biopsies even when the mucosa looks normal, because EoE is a histologic diagnosis. Solids-then-liquids means narrowing; solids and liquids from the start means motility. Alarm features do not change the test, only the cancer probability. When Zenker diverticulum is suspected, order barium before EGD, because blind intubation can perforate the pouch.
Summary table
Condition or topic
Clinical clues
Diagnosis
Management
Key numbers
Oropharyngeal dysphagia
Coughing, nasal regurgitation, drooling, or aspiration at swallow onset; stroke, Parkinson, ALS, myasthenia, head and neck radiation
Modified barium swallow with a speech-language pathologist; EGD has no primary role
Swallow therapy; cricopharyngeal bar: myotomy or botulinum toxin
n/a
Zenker diverticulum
Older patient; regurgitation of food eaten hours or days earlier, halitosis, gurgling, aspiration pneumonia
Barium swallow first; blind EGD can perforate the pouch
Cricopharyngeal myotomy with diverticulotomy (open, transoral stapled, or Z-POEM)
Dysphagia in roughly 90 percent
Esophageal dysphagia, mechanical
Solids first, then liquids, progressive
EGD with biopsies at two levels even if mucosa looks normal
Treat the lesion (ring, web, peptic stricture, EoE, cancer)
Age over 50, weight loss, iron deficiency, GI bleeding, progressive solid dysphagia, persistent vomiting
EGD is already indicated; alarm features raise cancer probability and urgency
EGD plus staging if a mass is found
Age over 50
Vignette
high-yield
A 72-year-old man presents with 6 months of difficulty swallowing localized to the lower neck at the cricoid. He reports gurgling during meals, regurgitation of undigested food eaten hours earlier, severe halitosis, and a soft left-sided cervical mass (~3 by 4 cm) that becomes more prominent after meals. He has lost 4 pounds. He does not cough during meals. Cautious upper endoscopy with minimal air insufflation confirms a 4 cm posterior diverticulum with retained food arising just above the cricopharyngeal muscle; the distal esophagus is normal. Barium swallow with lateral views shows a 4 cm posterior outpouching at the pharyngoesophageal junction at C5-C6, with retained barium after oral clearance. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Vignette
high-yield
A 68-year-old woman with hypertension and atrial fibrillation on apixaban is admitted 4 hours after symptom onset with a right MCA ischemic stroke confirmed on CT angiography. She has left hemiparesis (MRC grade 3/5 upper, 3/5 lower), mild dysarthria, and NIH Stroke Scale score of 12. Glasgow Coma Scale is 14 (eye opening spontaneous, verbal confused, motor localizes). She is alert enough to follow simple commands. Vital signs are stable, oxygen saturation 97 percent on room air, and chest X-ray is clear. Nursing staff asks whether she can start her home medications (including apixaban 5 mg twice daily) orally because she is alert. Which of the following is the most appropriate next test in evaluation?
Vignette
high-yield
A 56-year-old woman reports two years of intermittent solid-food dysphagia, particularly with bread and dry meats. She has no weight loss and no heartburn. Upper endoscopy shows a smooth, pulsatile extrinsic compression of the posterior esophagus approximately 23 cm from the incisors, with overlying normal mucosa. Barium swallow shows a transverse indentation at the same level. CT chest with IV contrast reveals an aberrant right subclavian artery coursing behind the esophagus. She uses no chronic medications and reports no NSAID use. Head and neck examination reveals normal cranial nerves, normal phonation, and no cervical lymphadenopathy. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
Vignette
high-yield
A 31-year-old man with EoE elects dietary therapy after counseling. His allergist and gastroenterologist agree on a step-up approach. Past medical history is otherwise unremarkable. He uses no chronic medications and reports no NSAID use. He does not smoke and drinks alcohol rarely. Vital signs are stable. Examination of the head and neck and abdominal examination are benign. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Vignette
high-yield
A 38-year-old man with EoE has been on swallowed budesonide orodispersible for 12 weeks. Repeat endoscopy shows histologic remission (3 eosinophils per high-power field) but a persistent narrow-caliber esophagus measuring 12 mm with rings. He continues to have intermittent solid-food dysphagia. Past medical history includes well-controlled hypertension on amlodipine and seasonal allergic rhinitis. Vital signs are stable. Examination shows normal voice and cough, no cervical lymphadenopathy, and a benign abdominal examination. Recent CBC, comprehensive metabolic panel, and TSH are within normal limits. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Vignette
high-yield
During upper endoscopy for evaluation of intermittent solid-food dysphagia, an endoscopist identifies two distinct ring-like narrowings in the distal esophagus: one at the squamocolumnar junction (a thin mucosal fold), and a second approximately 2 cm proximal to the first (a thicker, muscular constriction). Past medical history includes well-controlled hypertension on amlodipine and seasonal allergic rhinitis. Vital signs are stable. Examination shows normal voice and cough, no cervical lymphadenopathy, and a benign abdominal examination. Recent CBC, comprehensive metabolic panel, and TSH are within normal limits. Which of the following best characterizes these findings?
Vignette
high-yield
A 55-year-old woman has twelve months of progressive dysphagia to both solids and liquids. She reports regurgitation of undigested food, nocturnal cough, and seven pounds of weight loss. Upper endoscopy shows a dilated esophageal body with food residue; the esophagogastric junction passes with gentle pressure and shows no mass or ring; biopsies are unremarkable. She has well-controlled hyperlipidemia on atorvastatin and a 20-pack-year smoking history with cessation 5 years ago. She drinks alcohol socially and uses no NSAIDs. Vital signs are normal. Examination reveals normal phonation and cough, no cervical lymphadenopathy, and a benign abdominal exam. Routine laboratory studies including CBC and basic metabolic panel are within normal limits. Which of the following is the most appropriate next test in evaluation?
Vignette
high-yield
A 49-year-old woman has six months of progressive dysphagia to solids and liquids. Upper endoscopy is normal. High-resolution manometry shows an integrated relaxation pressure of 16 mmHg supine on a Medtronic catheter (upper limit of normal 15), with 40% normal peristalsis, no premature contractions, and no panesophageal pressurization. The Chicago Classification v4.0 diagnosis is equivocal between esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) and a borderline normal study. She has well-controlled hyperlipidemia on atorvastatin. Vital signs are normal. Examination reveals normal phonation and cough and a benign abdominal exam. Routine laboratory studies including CBC and basic metabolic panel are within normal limits. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Section 1.2: Globus, rumination, and functional esophageal pain
Globus, rumination, and functional chest pain are diagnosed after the structural and reflux workups come back normal. They arise from disordered gut-brain signaling (visceral hypersensitivity, learned somatic responses, or a behavioral re-swallow pattern), and all three are often mistaken for refractory GERD and treated with escalating PPI doses. When a patient who seems to have GERD does not respond to a PPI, consider these diagnoses; the treatment is a neuromodulator, a behavioral intervention, or, for rumination, diaphragmatic breathing, not more acid suppression.
Globus pharyngeus is the persistent or intermittent sensation of a lump, fullness, or tightness in the throat between meals, classically improved or unchanged by swallowing rather than worsened. The mechanism is multifactorial and includes hypertonic upper esophageal sphincter behavior, post-nasal drip, and reflux-related laryngeal sensitization in a subset, but in most patients no single physiologic abnormality is identified and the dominant driver is a heightened perception of normal pharyngeal sensation. The workup is targeted: rule out reflux and post-nasal drip with history and a focused exam, and look for a structural lesion only when alarm features (true dysphagia, weight loss, hoarseness, neck mass, smoking history) are present. Reassurance is the dominant management once the alarm screen is negative, because the natural history is benign and intervention beyond reassurance rarely improves outcome. PPI is not a default answer for globus.
Rumination syndrome is the effortless regurgitation of recently swallowed food into the mouth followed by re-swallowing or spitting, occurring without preceding nausea or retching, typically within ten to fifteen minutes of meal initiation. The mechanism is a learned, unintentional contraction of the abdominal wall and diaphragm that raises intra-abdominal pressure against a relaxed lower esophageal sphincter, producing retrograde flow of undigested gastric contents into the esophagus and pharynx. The Rome IV criteria require effortless regurgitation of recently swallowed food with re-swallowing or spitting, not preceded by retching, occurring on most days for at least three months with onset at least six months earlier. The diagnostic finding on high-resolution manometry with concurrent impedance is the abdominal-strain "R-wave" pressurization: a simultaneous rise in intra-gastric pressure and intra-esophageal pressure during the postprandial period without evidence of antecedent retching, often with the lower esophageal sphincter pressure dropping at the same instant.
The typical patient is young and has failed high-dose twice-daily PPI; the "regurgitation" occurs immediately after every meal, the material is recognizable as the food just eaten, and weight is often gained rather than lost. Treatment is diaphragmatic breathing taught by behavioral therapy (slow deep abdominal inspiration during the postprandial window, which is incompatible with the abdominal wall contraction that drives the rumination event) with cognitive behavioral therapy for refractory cases. Acid suppression has no role.
Functional chest pain is noncardiac chest pain after cardiac, GERD, EoE, and primary motility disorders have been excluded by appropriate testing. The mechanism is visceral hypersensitivity at the level of the esophageal afferent neurons and central pain processing pathways, in which non-painful esophageal events (low-volume reflux, normal contractions, mild distension) are perceived as pain because the gain on the pathway is set too high. Treatment is the neuromodulator: a low-dose tricyclic such as imipramine 25 to 50 mg or amitriptyline 25 to 50 mg at bedtime, an SSRI when TCAs are not tolerated, hypnotherapy, or cognitive behavioral therapy. The neuromodulator is the first-line drug class, not a higher PPI dose, because the lesion is in the pain processing pathway rather than the acid burden.
Functional heartburn and reflux hypersensitivity are the corresponding gut-brain disorders that present as heartburn and are detailed in the GERD chapter. Functional heartburn is heartburn with normal acid exposure time and negative symptom-reflux association, treated with a neuromodulator. Reflux hypersensitivity is heartburn with normal acid exposure time but positive symptom-reflux association, treated with combined neuromodulator and acid suppression because the patient genuinely associates symptoms with physiologic reflux events but the volume of acid exposure is below the threshold that defines GERD (see Ch 3 for the Lyon Consensus and pH-impedance interpretation).
What the boards test
When a patient who seems to have GERD fails a PPI, reconsider the diagnosis instead of raising the dose. Globus: lump between meals, unchanged or better with swallowing, managed with reassurance after an alarm screen. Rumination: effortless regurgitation of recognizable food within minutes of eating, R-wave on manometry-impedance, treated with diaphragmatic breathing. Functional chest pain: visceral hypersensitivity after cardiac, GERD, EoE, and motility causes are excluded, treated with a low-dose tricyclic.
Summary table
Condition or topic
Clinical clues
Diagnosis
Management
Key numbers
Globus
Lump or tightness in the throat between meals, unchanged or better with swallowing
Screen for alarm features (true dysphagia, weight loss, hoarseness, neck mass, smoking)
Reassurance; PPI is not a default
n/a
Rumination syndrome
Effortless regurgitation of recognizable food within minutes of eating, no retching; often weight gain; failed PPI
Rome IV criteria; manometry-impedance R-wave (simultaneous gastric and esophageal pressure rise)
Diaphragmatic breathing; CBT if refractory; no acid suppression
Symptoms on most days for 3 months
Functional chest pain
Noncardiac chest pain with cardiac, GERD, EoE, and motility causes excluded
Diagnosis of exclusion
Low-dose TCA (imipramine or amitriptyline at bedtime), SSRI, hypnotherapy, CBT
TCA 25 to 50 mg
Functional heartburn
Heartburn, normal acid exposure, negative symptom association
A 32-year-old man with newly diagnosed HIV, not yet on antiretroviral therapy, presents with one week of retrosternal pain on swallowing and odynophagia to both solids and liquids. His CD4 count is 65 cells per microliter. Upper endoscopy reveals two large, linear, deep punched-out ulcers in the distal esophagus with surrounding normal-appearing mucosa. He drinks alcohol socially and uses no NSAIDs. Vital signs are normal. Examination reveals normal phonation and cough, no cervical lymphadenopathy, and a benign abdominal exam. Routine laboratory studies including CBC and basic metabolic panel are within normal limits. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Section 1.3: Odynophagia workup
Odynophagia is mucosal injury until proven otherwise, and three history questions narrow the cause before any test: was a pill swallowed with too little water or while lying down, is the patient immunocompromised (HIV CD4 count, transplant status, chemotherapy, chronic inhaled or systemic steroids), and is there prior reflux or caustic injury (deep dive in the EoE and GI emergencies chapters, see Ch 5 for EoE and Ch 31 for caustic ingestion). The answers narrow the differential to one or two diagnoses before EGD, and the EGD is then directed toward biopsy of the appropriate site. Caustic injury is mentioned here only by name; the staging system, the airway management, and the long-term stricture surveillance are covered in the GI emergencies chapter.
Pill esophagitis is a direct mucosal injury where a tablet lodges and dissolves, most often at the aortic arch where the left mainstem bronchus indents the esophagus. The offenders are drugs that are acidic, hyperosmolar, or directly cytotoxic when dissolved: doxycycline and tetracycline, potassium chloride, bisphosphonates, NSAIDs, iron, and dabigatran among others. The history gives it away: sudden odynophagia hours to days after a specific pill taken with little water or at bedtime. When endoscopy is done it shows discrete shallow ulcers, often paired kissing ulcers, with normal intervening mucosa. Management is stopping the drug, sucralfate, and teaching upright dosing with a full glass of water (detailed in Ch 5, Section 5.6).
In infectious esophagitis, the patient's immune status narrows the differential before EGD. Candida is the most common and appears with inhaled or systemic steroids, PPI use, HIV with CD4 under 200, transplantation, antibiotics, and esophageal stasis; the endoscopy shows adherent white plaques and brushings show pseudohyphae, and fluconazole is first-line. HSV esophagitis produces shallow, volcano-edged ulcers, and the inclusions sit in squamous epithelial cells, so the biopsy targets the ulcer edge; treatment is acyclovir. CMV esophagitis produces large, deep, often solitary ulcers, and the owl-eye inclusions sit in stromal and endothelial cells, so the biopsy targets the ulcer base; treatment is IV ganciclovir followed by valganciclovir. The full recognition and treatment details for all three infections are in Ch 5.
A PPI user with concurrent inhaled corticosteroids and a fluconazole-responsive course points to Candida. A transplant recipient or a patient with HIV CD4 under 100 with deep solitary ulcers in the distal esophagus points to CMV. A volcano-edge shallow ulcer with multinucleated giant cells in epithelial cells at the edge points to HSV. The decision to skip empiric fluconazole and proceed directly to EGD is driven by severity of odynophagia, immunocompromised status, no response to a fluconazole trial, or clinical features suggesting a viral or pill etiology rather than Candida.
What the boards test
Take the exposure history before the scope: pill, immune status, prior reflux or caustic injury. Pill esophagitis is sudden odynophagia after a specific pill, with kissing ulcers at the aortic arch. Candida gives white plaques and is treated with fluconazole; skip the empiric trial and scope when odynophagia is severe, the host is immunocompromised, or fluconazole fails. HSV is sampled at the ulcer edge (epithelial inclusions) and CMV at the ulcer base (stromal and endothelial inclusions), because the inclusions live in different cells.
Summary table
Condition or topic
Clinical clues
Diagnosis
Management
Key numbers
Pill esophagitis
Sudden odynophagia after doxycycline, potassium chloride, bisphosphonate, NSAID, iron, or dabigatran taken with little water or at bedtime
EGD if done: discrete shallow or paired kissing ulcers at the aortic arch
Stop the drug, sucralfate, upright dosing with a full glass of water (Section 5.6)
n/a
Candida esophagitis
Inhaled or systemic steroids, PPI, HIV, transplant, antibiotics, stasis
Adherent white plaques; pseudohyphae on brushing
Fluconazole; scope instead of empiric trial if severe, immunocompromised, or fluconazole fails
HIV with CD4 under 200
HSV esophagitis
Shallow volcano-edged ulcers
Biopsy the ulcer edge (epithelial inclusions, multinucleated giant cells)
Acyclovir
n/a
CMV esophagitis
Large, deep, often solitary ulcers in transplant or advanced HIV
Biopsy the ulcer base (stromal and endothelial inclusions)
A 19-year-old woman college student presents with three days of severe retrosternal pain with swallowing. She started doxycycline one week ago for acne, taking it at bedtime with a small sip of water. She has no fever, no heartburn, and no prior GI history. Upper endoscopy shows a single, discrete, clean-based ulcer approximately 8 mm in diameter in the mid-esophagus with normal surrounding mucosa. She uses no chronic medications otherwise. Head and neck examination reveals normal cranial nerves, normal phonation, and no cervical lymphadenopathy. Abdominal examination is benign. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Vignette
A 46-year-old man with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (hemoglobin A1c 10.2%) and chronic inhaled corticosteroid use for severe asthma presents with one week of odynophagia and retrosternal burning. Upper endoscopy shows extensive white plaques covering the entire esophageal mucosa that bleed with brushing. Microscopy of the brushings shows yeast and pseudohyphae. Vital signs are stable. Examination shows normal voice and cough, no cervical lymphadenopathy, and a benign abdominal examination. Recent CBC, comprehensive metabolic panel, and TSH are within normal limits. Which of the following is the best initial treatment?
Vignette
A 34-year-old man with depression is brought to the emergency department 3 hours after intentionally ingesting approximately 200 mL of a drain cleaner (sodium hydroxide solution) in a suicide attempt. He is drooling, complains of retrosternal pain, and has visible oropharyngeal burns. Vital signs are stable and there is no peritoneal tenderness. Examination reveals normal phonation and cough and no subcutaneous emphysema. Routine laboratory studies including CBC and basic metabolic panel are within normal limits. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Vignette
high-yield
A 28-year-old woman with long-standing Crohn's disease (currently in clinical remission on maintenance vedolizumab) presents with two weeks of odynophagia and mild retrosternal pain. Upper endoscopy reveals multiple aphthous ulcers scattered throughout the mid-esophagus with relatively normal intervening mucosa. Biopsies from the ulcers show non-caseating granulomas. Candida, CMV, and HSV stains are negative. Vital signs are stable. Examination shows normal voice and cough, no cervical lymphadenopathy, and a benign abdominal examination. Recent CBC, comprehensive metabolic panel, and TSH are within normal limits. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
Section 1.4: Post-surgical and systemic dysphagia
The causes in this section are missed by the standard EGD-then-manometry workup unless the history is taken: prior fundoplication or bariatric surgery, an autoimmune disease, chest or neck radiation, or neurologic findings. Each antireflux and bariatric operation has its own typical complications. Scleroderma esophagus, Sjogren, amyloid, and chemoradiation each compromise either peristalsis, salivary flow, muscular integrity, or mucosal architecture in ways that change how the swallow proceeds. The neuromuscular disorders (myasthenia gravis, ALS, polymyositis and dermatomyositis) attack the oropharyngeal phase and are recognized by the associated systemic findings and electromyography rather than the swallow study alone.
The Nissen fundoplication wraps 360 degrees of gastric fundus around the distal esophagus to create an antireflux barrier; partial fundoplications (Toupet at 270 degrees posterior, Dor at 180 degrees anterior) trade some reflux control for less postoperative dysphagia and less gas-bloat.
The slipped wrap occurs when the wrap migrates onto the proximal stomach rather than encircling the distal esophagus, producing the paradoxical combination of recurrent reflux (because the wrap no longer reinforces the lower esophageal sphincter) plus dysphagia (because the wrap now creates a relative obstruction at the gastric body). The tight wrap presents with early postoperative dysphagia, often immediately after surgery, because the wrap is too snug around the esophagus and the bolus cannot pass; treatment is pneumatic dilation in the early postoperative period or surgical revision if dilation fails. The gas-bloat syndrome is the inability to belch, leading to abdominal distension and sometimes bloating-related discomfort, because the wrap acts as a one-way valve that prevents transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations from venting swallowed air. Telescoping occurs when the gastroesophageal junction slips upward through an intact wrap, distorting the anatomy in a way that reproduces both reflux and dysphagia.
Approximately 10 to 30 percent of patients resume antireflux medication within 5 years of fundoplication. Workup begins with barium swallow rather than EGD because barium shows the wrap geometry and the relationship of the gastroesophageal junction to the wrap; EGD follows for direct mucosal assessment. PPI is reintroduced for slipped wraps with reflux, dilation for the tight wrap, and surgical revision is reserved for refractory cases.
The cause of post-bariatric dysphagia depends on the operation. Sleeve gastrectomy creates a tubular stomach by stapling along the greater curvature, and the anatomic vulnerability is at the incisura angularis, where a kink, twist, or stricture at the staple line produces a fixed obstruction with progressive dysphagia and food intolerance. Sleeve gastrectomy also causes or exacerbates reflux rather than relieving it, because reduced gastric volume, loss of the angle of His, disrupted sling fibers at the gastroesophageal junction, and a higher intragastric pressure environment combine to drive reflux upward; this is why sleeve gastrectomy is generally avoided in morbidly obese patients with established GERD, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the antireflux bariatric operation of choice in that population. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass produces dysphagia most often through anastomotic stricture at the gastrojejunal anastomosis, presenting weeks to months after surgery with progressive solid food intolerance; through-the-scope balloon dilation is the treatment, often requiring multiple sessions. Marginal ulcer at the gastrojejunal anastomosis presents with epigastric pain, dysphagia, and GI bleeding, and the predictable risk factors are smoking (the strongest modifiable factor), NSAID use, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Treatment is high-dose PPI plus reversal of the modifiable factors (tobacco cessation, NSAID discontinuation, H. pylori eradication if positive), with surgical revision reserved for refractory or perforating ulcers.
Scleroderma esophagus is the classic disorder of failed peristalsis with a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter. Fibrosis of the smooth muscle segment abolishes the peristaltic wave while the same process drops LES pressure, so reflux pours back and is not cleared, producing erosive esophagitis, peptic stricture, and Barrett esophagus. Dysphagia in scleroderma therefore comes from two sources, weak transit and peptic stricture, and the management is aggressive acid suppression and dilation rather than fundoplication. The manometric criteria, serology, and management are covered in full in Ch 2, Section 2.4.
Sjogren syndrome produces dysphagia by removing the salivary contribution to swallowing rather than by damaging the esophagus directly. The mechanism is autoimmune lymphocytic infiltration of salivary and lacrimal glands, which produces xerostomia and reduces the lubrication and bolus formation that swallowing depends on. Patients describe difficulty initiating swallow with dry foods such as bread or crackers, often improved by water sips and worse at the end of the day. Treatment is salivary stimulation with pilocarpine 5 mg four times daily or cevimeline 30 mg three times daily (muscarinic agonists that increase salivary flow), saliva substitutes, careful oral hygiene to prevent the dental decay that follows xerostomia, and humidification of dry environments. The reduced salivary clearance is also a refractory-reflux clue when Sjogren and GERD coexist, because saliva normally contributes to esophageal acid clearance.
Amyloid causes dysphagia through infiltrative deposition of insoluble fibrils in the esophageal muscularis and submucosa. The two principal forms in adults are AL (light chain) amyloid in the setting of plasma cell dyscrasia, and ATTR (transthyretin) amyloid in either the hereditary or wild-type form. The hint at the bedside is macroglossia, which suggests AL amyloid in particular and warrants serum and urine immunofixation, free light chains, and a skeletal survey or marrow biopsy in the appropriate clinical setting. Dysphagia from amyloid reflects infiltration of the muscularis with replacement of contractile elements, and the manometric pattern is variable. Treatment is directed at the underlying amyloidogenic process (chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplant for AL amyloid; tafamidis, patisiran, or inotersen for ATTR amyloid) rather than at the esophagus itself.
Chemoradiation injures the esophagus in an acute phase and a late phase. Acute radiation mucositis develops during or shortly after thoracic or head and neck radiation and presents with severe odynophagia, dysphagia, and dehydration; supportive care, topical anesthetics, opioid analgesia for severe cases, and nutritional support are the management. Late radiation stricture develops months to years after radiation and presents with progressive solid food dysphagia from fibrotic narrowing in the radiation field. Proactive swallow therapy during and after radiation reduces the rate of stricture and improves long-term swallowing function. Endoscopic dilation, often serial, is the treatment for established stricture; complete obstruction may require combined antegrade and retrograde rendezvous techniques.
The neuromuscular dysphagias attack the oropharyngeal phase and are recognized by the associated systemic findings rather than the swallow alone. Myasthenia gravis is autoimmune blockade of the postsynaptic acetylcholine receptor at the neuromuscular junction, and the clinical signature is fatigability that worsens with repeated effort and improves with rest, often with ptosis and diplopia. Anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies are positive in the majority of generalized cases, with anti-MuSK antibodies covering a subset of seronegative patients. Treatment is pyridostigmine for symptomatic relief (an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that prolongs acetylcholine action at the synapse), with immunosuppression and thymectomy for selected patients.
ALS produces oropharyngeal dysphagia through degeneration of bulbar motor neurons, with fasciculations, tongue atrophy, and progressive limb weakness as the supporting findings; electromyography shows the denervation pattern and confirms the diagnosis. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis are inflammatory myopathies presenting with symmetric proximal muscle weakness (difficulty rising from a chair or lifting the arms overhead), elevated creatine kinase, anti-Jo-1 antibodies in a subset, and oropharyngeal dysphagia in roughly half of patients with bulbar involvement. Dermatomyositis adds the cutaneous findings (heliotrope rash on the eyelids, Gottron papules over the knuckles, shawl sign on the upper chest and back) and carries an associated malignancy risk that warrants age-appropriate cancer screening, with gastric, lung, ovarian, breast, and lymphoma topping the list.
What the boards test
Ask about prior surgery, autoimmune disease, radiation, and neurologic symptoms. After fundoplication, barium comes first: tight wrap gives early dysphagia (dilate), slipped wrap gives reflux plus dysphagia, gas-bloat is the inability to belch. After sleeve gastrectomy, look for a stricture or kink at the incisura and expect worse reflux; after Roux-en-Y, look for anastomotic stricture or marginal ulcer (smoking, NSAIDs, H. pylori). Scleroderma is absent peristalsis plus a hypotensive LES, treated with twice-daily PPI and not fundoplication. Oropharyngeal dysphagia with systemic signs points to myasthenia, ALS, or inflammatory myopathy, with cancer screening in dermatomyositis.
Summary table
Condition or topic
Clinical clues
Diagnosis
Management
Key numbers
Tight fundoplication
Dysphagia immediately after surgery
Barium swallow first
Pneumatic dilation; revision if dilation fails
n/a
Slipped wrap or telescoping
Recurrent reflux plus dysphagia
Barium swallow, then EGD
PPI; revision if refractory
10 to 30 percent resume antireflux medication within 5 years
Proximal weakness, high CK; heliotrope rash and Gottron papules in dermatomyositis
CK, anti-Jo-1
Age-appropriate cancer screening in dermatomyositis
Dysphagia in roughly half with bulbar involvement
Vignette
high-yield
A 74-year-old man with 6 years of Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage 3, on levodopa-carbidopa 25/100 three times daily) and a prior right MCA ischemic stroke 14 months ago (residual mild left hemiparesis) presents with 4 months of progressive difficulty swallowing. His wife reports that he coughs or chokes at the start of almost every meal, particularly with thin liquids, and has had nasal regurgitation on two occasions. He has lost 9 pounds (current weight 68 kg, prior 72 kg). He denies any chest-level sensation of food sticking. Exam shows mild dysarthria, reduced palatal elevation, and a delayed pharyngeal swallow on bedside clinical exam. Oxygen saturation is 96 percent on room air. Chest X-ray shows mild right lower-lobe atelectasis without consolidation. Which of the following is the most appropriate initial test?
Vignette
high-yield
A 48-year-old woman reports 3 months of progressive difficulty swallowing that worsens through the course of each meal and worsens toward evening. She swallows the first few bites of dinner without difficulty but struggles by mid-meal, and by the end of the day she has difficulty with thin liquids. She has also noticed bilateral ptosis that worsens toward evening and diplopia with sustained upgaze. Weight is stable at 62 kg. Neurologic exam shows bilateral ptosis that worsens after 60 seconds of sustained upgaze, proximal muscle weakness that fatigues on repeated deltoid abduction (MRC grade drops from 5/5 to 4/5 after 30 repetitions), and normal reflexes without fasciculations. Creatine kinase is 95 IU/L (normal). Thyroid-stimulating hormone is within normal limits. Which of the following is the most appropriate next test in evaluation?
Vignette
high-yield
A 68-year-old man presents with 12 months of progressive difficulty swallowing solids and recurrent falls from buckling of his knees (3 falls in the past 2 months). He has also noticed weakness opening jars and turning keys. Exam shows asymmetric weakness of the finger flexors (flexor digitorum profundus MRC 3/5 right, 4/5 left) and bilateral quadriceps weakness (MRC 3/5 bilaterally) with selective atrophy of the quadriceps. Deltoid strength is preserved (MRC 5/5). Creatine kinase is 600 IU/L (normal less than 200). His primary care physician prescribed prednisone 60 mg daily for 12 weeks with no improvement in strength or dysphagia. Skin exam is unremarkable (no heliotrope rash, no Gottron papules, no mechanic's hands). Antinuclear antibody is negative. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
Vignette
high-yield
A 52-year-old woman presents with 6 weeks of progressive symmetric proximal muscle weakness (difficulty rising from a chair without using her arms, difficulty combing her hair) and progressive dysphagia to both solids and liquids. On examination, she has a violaceous, edematous rash over both eyelids (heliotrope rash) and scaly erythematous papules over the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints (Gottron papules). She denies distal or asymmetric weakness. Serum creatine kinase is 4,800 IU/L (normal less than 200), aldolase is elevated, and antinuclear antibody is positive at a titer of 1:640. She has lost 4 pounds. Review of systems is otherwise unremarkable without fever, lymphadenopathy, or pulmonary symptoms. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
Vignette
high-yield
A 28-year-old man with childhood asthma on inhaled fluticasone, seasonal allergic rhinitis, and mild atopic dermatitis presents after his second food bolus impaction in 6 months, both requiring emergency-department disimpaction. He has intermittent solid-food dysphagia, particularly with bread and steak, but swallows liquids without difficulty. Weight is stable. He denies heartburn, regurgitation, and nocturnal symptoms. Upper endoscopy after the second impaction shows multiple concentric rings, linear furrows, and white punctate exudates in the distal third (EREFS: rings 2, furrows 1, exudates 1, edema 1, stricture 0). No mass, no deep ulceration, no luminal stricture. Peripheral eosinophil count is 650 cells per microliter (mildly elevated). Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Vignette
high-yield
A 62-year-old woman presents with 3 months of intermittent solid-food dysphagia, classically with bread and dry meat ('steakhouse syndrome'). Episodes last a few minutes and resolve spontaneously, often after she drinks water to clear the bolus. She has never required emergency disimpaction. She has 15 years of mild GERD managed with over-the-counter famotidine 20 mg at bedtime. BMI is 28, weight stable. Upper endoscopy shows a thin circumferential mucosal B-ring at the squamocolumnar junction with a luminal diameter of 12 mm on through-the-scope balloon measurement, a 2-cm sliding hiatal hernia, and LA grade A erosive esophagitis. Biopsies from proximal and distal esophagus show fewer than 5 eosinophils per high-power field. No stricture, no mass, no Barrett's metaplasia. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Vignette
high-yield
A 52-year-old woman who emigrated from a low-resource region 8 months ago presents with 2 years of progressive solid-food dysphagia and fatigue. She also reports spoon-shaped fingernails (koilonychia). Physical exam shows pale conjunctiva, atrophic glossitis, and angular cheilitis. Hemoglobin is 8.7 g/dL with MCV 68 fL, red cell distribution width 19 percent (elevated), ferritin 4 ng/mL (profoundly low), transferrin saturation 3 percent, and peripheral smear showing microcytic hypochromic red cells. Vitamin B12 and folate are normal. Upper endoscopy reveals a thin 1-mm postcricoid cervical esophageal web at approximately 18 cm from the incisors with a 10-mm luminal diameter; the distal esophagus is normal. Biopsies of the esophageal body are unremarkable. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Vignette
high-yield
A 68-year-old man with 25 years of GERD managed intermittently with over-the-counter famotidine 20 mg as needed (not continuous PPI) reports 18 months of slowly progressive solid-food dysphagia, initially only with dry meat and bread, now with most solid foods. He denies weight loss (BMI 31, stable), hematemesis, or iron-deficiency anemia. Upper endoscopy shows a smooth, concentric distal esophageal stricture 1 cm long at 40 cm from the incisors with a through-the-scope-measured luminal diameter of 10 mm, with LA grade B erosive esophagitis extending 3 cm above the stricture. Biopsies of the stricture are negative for dysplasia and eosinophils (less than 5 per HPF); biopsies of the distal esophagus confirm erosive esophagitis without intestinal metaplasia (no Barrett's). A hiatal hernia measuring 3 cm is present. Which of the following is the best initial treatment?
Vignette
high-yield
A 58-year-old man with a 30-pack-year cigarette smoking history (current smoker, one pack per day) and heavy daily alcohol use (4 to 6 drinks per day for 30 years) presents with 3 months of rapidly progressive solid-food dysphagia, now with difficulty swallowing liquids as well. He has lost 12 pounds (from 82 to 76.5 kg, BMI 24). He reports odynophagia and anterior chest pain with swallowing. ECOG performance status is 1. Upper endoscopy shows a large circumferential ulcerated mid-esophageal mass at 28 to 32 cm from the incisors narrowing the lumen to approximately 6 mm. Biopsies confirm invasive, poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Labs show hemoglobin 11.8 g/dL, albumin 3.4 g/dL, normal liver enzymes, and normal creatinine. Which of the following is the most appropriate next test in evaluation?
Vignette
high-yield
A 64-year-old man with 20 years of GERD on intermittent PPI and known long-segment Barrett's esophagus (C4M6 Prague, last surveillance biopsies 2 years ago showed no dysplasia) presents with 4 months of progressive solid-food dysphagia and 8 pounds of weight loss. BMI is 32. He has a 40-pack-year smoking history (quit 5 years ago). ECOG performance status is 1. Upper endoscopy shows a 5-cm circumferential ulcerated mass at the gastroesophageal junction extending 4 cm proximally into the distal esophagus (Siewert type II), narrowing the lumen to 8 mm. Biopsies confirm moderately differentiated invasive adenocarcinoma with HER2 IHC 1+ (non-overexpressed) and PD-L1 CPS of 3. Hemoglobin 12.4 g/dL, albumin 3.7 g/dL, normal liver enzymes. Which of the following is the most appropriate next test in evaluation?
Vignette
An 82-year-old man with 20 years of hypertension (home BP 155/85 on amlodipine and lisinopril) presents with 4 months of progressive solid-food dysphagia. He has lost 3 pounds (current BMI 26). Vital signs show BP 162/88 and an irregularly irregular pulse at 78 with a known history of atrial fibrillation on apixaban. Chest X-ray shows a widened mediastinum with a tortuous thoracic aortic contour. Upper endoscopy shows extrinsic pulsatile compression of the mid-esophagus at 25 to 28 cm from the incisors with normal overlying mucosa, no mass, no ulceration. Biopsies are negative for malignancy. The pulsatility is synchronous with his arterial pulse. Which of the following is the most appropriate next test in evaluation?
Vignette
high-yield
A 34-year-old man with biopsy-confirmed eosinophilic esophagitis (diagnosed 2 years ago with 35 eosinophils per HPF) on maintenance swallowed fluticasone 220 mcg twice daily presents to the emergency department 60 minutes after a piece of steak lodged in his chest during dinner. He cannot swallow his saliva and is actively drooling. He denies chest pain out of proportion, subcutaneous emphysema, or fever. Vital signs: BP 128/80, HR 92, RR 18, oxygen saturation 98 percent. Physical exam shows no neck crepitus and a clear chest. Chest X-ray shows no pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax. His last endoscopy 6 months ago showed persistent rings and fibrostenotic features despite fluticasone. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Vignette
high-yield
A 24-year-old woman is newly diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis. She presented with 18 months of intermittent solid-food dysphagia and one prior food bolus impaction requiring emergency disimpaction. Upper endoscopy showed rings, linear furrows, and distal white exudates (EREFS score 4). Biopsies confirmed 35 eosinophils per HPF in the distal esophagus and 22 eos/HPF in the proximal esophagus. She has no prior GERD symptoms or PPI exposure. She has asthma controlled on albuterol as needed and seasonal allergic rhinitis. BMI is 23. She is counseled on treatment options. Which of the following is the best initial treatment?
Vignette
high-yield
A 56-year-old woman with type II achalasia is six weeks post-POEM procedure. She reports partial symptomatic improvement: she can swallow most solids and liquids, but she still feels residual dysphagia after heavy meals. Her Eckardt score has improved from 7 to 3. Past medical history is otherwise unremarkable. She uses no chronic medications and reports no NSAID use. Vital signs are stable. Examination of the head and neck and abdominal examination are benign. Which of the following is the most appropriate recommendation?
Vignette
high-yield
A 32-year-old man with seasonal allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis presents with five years of slowly progressive dysphagia to solids and three episodes of food impaction in the past year. He reports occasional retrosternal squeezing pain with meals. He takes no medications and has never used a PPI. EGD shows subtle longitudinal furrows and a single proximal ring; mucosa otherwise appears normal. High-resolution manometry per Chicago v4.0 shows a normal integrated relaxation pressure of 12 mmHg with twenty percent of swallows producing hypercontractile waves (DCI over 8000 mmHg·s·cm) and shortened distal latency on three swallows. The reading gastroenterologist suggests type III achalasia or distal esophageal spasm and proposes botulinum toxin injection. Which of the following findings would most strongly support eosinophilic esophagitis over a primary spastic motility disorder?
Vignette
high-yield
A 41-year-old woman presents with four months of a persistent sensation of a lump in her throat. The sensation is present throughout the day when she is not eating and, importantly, actually lessens briefly when she swallows water or food. She has no weight loss, no heartburn, no regurgitation, no pain, no nocturnal cough, and no voice change. BMI is 24. Her primary care physician obtained upper endoscopy 6 weeks ago, which was completely normal with no erosive esophagitis, ring, stricture, or mass, and biopsies of the proximal and distal esophagus were negative for eosinophilic infiltrate. Past medical history is notable for generalized anxiety disorder managed with sertraline 50 mg daily for 2 years. Physical examination including neck and neurologic exam is unremarkable. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
Vignette
high-yield
A 24-year-old female graduate student presents with 12 months of 'food coming back up' after nearly every meal. Episodes begin 10 to 20 minutes after she eats, are effortless, and are not preceded by nausea or retching. She describes chewing the regurgitated material and re-swallowing it. BMI is 22 with no weight loss (stable within 1 kg over the year). She denies heartburn, dysphagia, chest pain, and nocturnal cough. Upper endoscopy 6 months ago was completely normal with negative proximal and distal esophageal biopsies for eosinophilic infiltrate. High-resolution manometry (Medtronic catheter, supine protocol with 10 swallows) showed normal peristalsis with a mean distal contractile integral of 1,400 mmHg·s·cm and a normal median integrated relaxation pressure of 7 mmHg. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
Vignette
high-yield
A 59-year-old woman is 3 weeks into concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced lung cancer with a radiation field that includes the mediastinum. She presents with severe odynophagia, dysphagia to solids, and weight loss of 5 pounds over the past week. She has no fever. Upper endoscopy, if performed, would show diffuse mucosal erythema and superficial ulceration throughout the thoracic esophagus within the radiation field, without discrete deep ulcers or white plaques. Vital signs are stable. Examination shows normal voice and cough, no cervical lymphadenopathy, and a benign abdominal examination. Recent CBC, comprehensive metabolic panel, and TSH are within normal limits. Which of the following is the best initial treatment?
Vignette
high-yield
A 58-year-old man underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication six months ago for PPI-refractory GERD. For the past three months he has had persistent solid-food dysphagia that has not improved. He has lost four pounds. Upper endoscopy shows a well-constructed wrap and no stricture, hernia, or mucosal lesion. Past medical history includes well-controlled hypertension on amlodipine and seasonal allergic rhinitis. Vital signs are stable. Examination shows normal voice and cough, no cervical lymphadenopathy, and a benign abdominal examination. Recent CBC, comprehensive metabolic panel, and TSH are within normal limits. Which of the following is the most appropriate next test in evaluation?
Vignette
high-yield
A 62-year-old man underwent POEM for type III achalasia four years ago with excellent initial response (Eckardt score decreased from 9 to 1). Over the past six months, his dysphagia has recurred (current Eckardt score 6), and he has lost three pounds. Past medical history is otherwise unremarkable. He uses no chronic medications and reports no NSAID use. Vital signs are stable. Examination of the head and neck and abdominal examination are benign. Which of the following is the most appropriate next test in evaluation?
Vignette
A 41-year-old woman with obesity underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy 18 months ago. She initially did well, losing 70 pounds. Over the past six months, she has developed progressive dysphagia to solids and frequent post-meal regurgitation of undigested food. She denies heartburn. Upper endoscopy shows a patent gastroesophageal junction, a mildly dilated distal esophagus, and a functional stenosis or narrowing of the mid-sleeve at the incisura angularis. Past medical history includes well-controlled hypertension on amlodipine. Vital signs are stable. Examination shows normal voice and cough, no cervical lymphadenopathy, and a benign abdominal examination. Recent CBC, comprehensive metabolic panel, and TSH are within normal limits. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Vignette
high-yield
An 82-year-old woman with no systemic illness reports mild intermittent dysphagia with large solid-food boluses, relieved by chewing carefully and drinking water. She has no weight loss, no regurgitation, and no alarm features. Upper endoscopy is normal. High-resolution manometry shows minor changes: mildly reduced DCI (350 mmHg·s·cm average) with occasional weak swallows, normal IRP, and a normal peristaltic pattern overall. Past medical history is otherwise unremarkable. She uses no chronic medications and reports no NSAID use. Vital signs are stable. Examination of the head and neck and abdominal examination are benign. Which of the following is the most appropriate recommendation?
Vignette
A 64-year-old woman presents with eighteen months of progressive solid-food dysphagia and one episode of food impaction. She has a long history of pruritic violaceous papules on her wrists and ankles, lacy white plaques on her buccal mucosa, and erosive vulvar lesions that have been managed by dermatology. She takes no NSAIDs or bisphosphonates. EGD shows white pseudomembranes, mucosal sloughing on insufflation, and a tight stricture in the proximal esophagus. Biopsy demonstrates a band-like lymphocytic infiltrate at the dermal-epithelial junction with civatte bodies; direct immunofluorescence reveals fibrinogen deposition along the basement membrane in a shaggy pattern. Eosinophil count is 2 per high-power field. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
Esophageal Symptoms and Diagnostic Workup | Study Guide | Board Pearls